<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leadership Excellence Archives - Sharon Weinberg</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sharonweinberg.com/category/leadership-excellence/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sharonweinberg.com</link>
	<description>Leadership and Business Strategy Coach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Good Habits to Strengthen Your Leadership</title>
		<link>https://sharonweinberg.com/good-habits-to-strengthen-your-leadership</link>
					<comments>https://sharonweinberg.com/good-habits-to-strengthen-your-leadership#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Weinberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership Excellence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sharonweinberg.com/?p=1265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/good-habits-to-strengthen-your-leadership">Good Habits to Strengthen Your Leadership</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
					<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h4 style="text-align: right;"><em>“We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” </em>&#8211; Aristotle</h4>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As a leader, your habits either support or diminish your leadership.</p>
<p>Given the reflexive nature of habits, we often aren’t aware of some of the behaviors or practices we are doing or not doing. Moreover, we often don’t consider the impact of our habits on our direct reports, problem solving capability, and the success of our teams until problems arise, opportunities are missed, and targets aren’t achieved.</p>
<p>Being more deliberate in your leadership habits can strengthen the beneficial practices you are already doing.</p>
<p>As a leadership coach and organizational performance consultant, I’ve seen many leaders inadvertently sabotage their success and that of their teams by not consistently putting into practice some good habits. The operative word here is <em>consistently</em>. The good news is that you can easily move from auto-pilot to a place of more consciously shaping your impact, supporting your teams, and modelling practices that foster high engagement, effective collaboration, and follow-through with a few simple practices that you commit to using.</p>
<p>To make thinking about and adopting habits a bit easier, I like to divide them into four categories: relational, influencing, problem solving, and executing. Within each category, I’ve identified five to six specific actions that if <u>done consistently</u> will result in tangible benefits for your leadership and the performance of your teams. There are, of course, other actions one could add to each of the categories and I encourage you to do so as you see fit.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" width="623">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Good Habits to Strengthen Your Leadership</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Relational</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="156"><strong>Influencing </strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="156"><strong>Problem-Solving </strong></td>
<td width="156">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Executing</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156">
<p>&#8211; Listen to each person from a place of learning and respect.</p>
<p>&#8211; Build trust by only committing to what you will follow through on.</p>
<p>&#8211; Encourage and safeguard candor.</p>
<p>&#8211; Regularly explain vision, goals, plans, issues, and progress to support connection and alignment. (Weekly or at least once a month.)</p>
<p>&#8211; Regularly acknowledge individual and team contributions and successes privately and publicly.</p>
<p>&#8211; Resolve conflicts as they come up even if doing so is uncomfortable for you.</p>
</td>
<td width="156">
<p>&#8211; Offer your perspective, feelings, and suggestions <u>last</u>.</p>
<p>&#8211; Explore others’ opinions, needs, and feelings <u>first</u>.</p>
<p>&#8211; Acknowledge people’s ideas and contributions (even the naysayers) to make them feel valued.</p>
<p>&#8211; Identify and vocalize the common ground often.</p>
<p>&#8211; Present your ideas in a logical, open-to-discussion way to garner support. (No <em>“my way or the highway.”</em>)</p>
<p>&#8211; Create hybrid solutions to support greater inclusion and engagement.</p>
</td>
<td width="156">
<p>&#8211; Do some simple root cause analysis to ensure that you are not just addressing symptoms.</p>
<p>&#8211; Frame problems accurately and objectively before beginning dialogue and solution development.</p>
<p>&#8211; Surface and assess the validity of assumptions.</p>
<p>&#8211; Balance advocacy and inquiry in dialogues.</p>
<p>&#8211; Decide how decisions will be made and what criteria will be used <em>before </em>you make the decisions.</p>
<p>&#8211; Use critical thinking methods to uncover biases and barriers, analyze data, and create options.</p>
</td>
<td width="156">
<p>&#8211; Create a tactical roadmap (what, how, who, by when) to promote clarity and shared understanding about how execution will take place.</p>
<p>&#8211; Communicate with all those involved what their specific role and actions will be. (Avoid the <em>“No one told me, I didn’t know.”</em>)</p>
<p>&#8211; Conduct weekly or bi-weekly team check-ins to smooth the path forward.</p>
<p>&#8211; Take the warning signals that successful execution is in jeopardy seriously. Intervene to help course correct.</p>
<p>&#8211; Acknowledge progress not just completion.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>How You Can Strengthen Your Good Habits </strong></p>
<p><strong>Step 1:</strong> <strong>Review the actions listed in each category </strong>and put a check next to the ones you do <u>consistently 75% of the time or more</u>.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2:</strong>  <strong>For the actions that you checked, ask yourself, <em>“What makes it easy for me to do these actions so consistently?” </em>and </strong><em><strong>“What are the benefits my team and I realize because of doing these actions?”</strong> </em>The intent here is for you to recognize what you are doing well and its beneficial impact on your leadership and your team’s successes. Your raised awareness will be supportive in helping you add new habits to your practice. We do more of what benefits us.</p>
<p><strong>Step 3: Circle one or two new actions in any category or within a given category that you would like to put into practice consistently over the next three months.</strong> I suggest three months because there will be times when you forget to do the new practices, or not have enough opportunities to build the new habit during a shorter timeframe.</p>
<p><strong>Step 4:</strong>  <strong>Write your two new actions in a few places where you will be regularly reminded to do them.</strong> Set them as daily/weekly reminders in your calendar. Review what’s on your plate for the week and integrate the new actions proactively into your weekly work. Add them as actions into the agendas for your meetings and problem solving sessions. The intent here is that if you don’t see it, you won’t remember to do it.</p>
<p><strong>Step 5:</strong>  <strong>Set a date with yourself in your calendar three months from when you begin.</strong> This will be time for you to assess your progress and the changes you’ve experienced in your leadership because of putting in place the new habits.</p>
<p><strong>Step 6:</strong> <strong>Keep a simple log to help you track your progress.</strong> A post-it with the starting date of the week and a check mark each time you do the new habit can be sufficient acknowledgement of your progress, or a truth-telling indicator when you’ve slipped up. Celebrate your success. If you got off track, don’t beat yourself up. Simply renew your commitment.</p>
<p><strong>Step 7:</strong>  Your three-month check in date has arrived. <strong>Honestly assess your progress</strong> with implementing the new habits. <em>In what way was it easy or hard to adopt the new habits? </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>What shifts did you see in your leadership because of your new habits? Your work relationships? The performance of your teams?  Your work culture?</em></p>
<p>Review the matrix again. Add at least one new habit every three months and repeat steps 4 through 7.</p>
<p><strong>One year from when you started, you will have four to eight new habits integrated into the way you lead, influence outcomes, collaboratively problem solve, and achieve results.</strong> You will have also modelled good habits for your team members and colleagues to emulate.</p>
<p>Simple but deliberate changes can have big impacts on the excellence of your leadership, the performance of your teams, and the positivity and productivity of your work culture. All it takes is awareness, real intention, and consistent commitment to do things a bit differently. Practice makes permanent one new habit at a time.</p>
<p><em>If you found this article helpful, please share with your colleagues and friends.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></div>
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->
				
				
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_row -->
				
				
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_section -->
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/good-habits-to-strengthen-your-leadership">Good Habits to Strengthen Your Leadership</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://sharonweinberg.com/good-habits-to-strengthen-your-leadership/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it really &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no?&#8221; &#8211; How Much Agreement Do You Really Have?</title>
		<link>https://sharonweinberg.com/is-it-really-yes-or-no</link>
					<comments>https://sharonweinberg.com/is-it-really-yes-or-no#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Weinberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem-Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic and Critical Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Engagement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sharonweinberg.com/?p=1257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever had the experience where it seemed everyone agreed with a proposed approach or a decision at a meeting, only to find out afterward as you start implementation that there are serious reservations, lukewarm commitment, or worse sabotage of the effort? Me too. It feels confusing, disheartening, and frustrating. Often in people&#8217;s minds [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/is-it-really-yes-or-no">Is it really &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no?&#8221; &#8211; How Much Agreement Do You Really Have?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever had the experience where it seemed everyone agreed with a proposed approach or a decision at a meeting, only to find out afterward as you start implementation that there are serious reservations, lukewarm commitment, or worse sabotage of the effort? Me too. It feels confusing, disheartening, and frustrating.</p>
<p>Often in people&#8217;s minds and hearts, there is a range of &#8220;yes&#8221; and &#8220;no,&#8221; but if given only a binary choice (yes or no), the depth of support or lack of support is not surfaced.</p>
<p>By not making this spectrum transparent, we short change our decision-making processes, diminish commitment and fail to  surface important discontent or blind spots that need to be addressed before implementation.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have to be this way.</p>
<p>For more than a decade, I&#8217;ve used a tool to strengthen the strategic thinking and decision-making of the leaders, teams, and organizations I support. The results have always been illuminating for all involved because it eliminates misassumptions about the level of support and commitment for a proposed approach or decision, as well as creating the opportunity for important refinement to address fatal flaws.</p>
<p>The tool is the Gradients of Agreement, developed by Sam Kaner and offered in his book <u>Facilitator&#8217;s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making</u>. I&#8217;ve adapted Sam&#8217;s model over the years, tweaking the language to meet the decision-making culture of specific clients. One client wanted &#8220;Heck Yeah!&#8221; for wholehearted endorsement and another client wanted &#8220;When Hell Freezes Over&#8221; to indicate blocking a proposed approach. Using language that resonates and is clear for the group involved in the decision-making fosters engagement and a higher level of transparency about individual thinking.</p>
<p>Using the Gradients of Agreement during a strategic planning engagement enabled the executive leadership team to garner a +90% wholehearted support for a new vision for their organization after they refined the original vision that had yielded only 70% support. Getting the additional support was critical for engagement and successful implementation.</p>
<p>The Gradients of Agreement below shows a wider range of what people really mean when they give thumbs up or thumbs down. It is most useful for decision-making where there are diverse and competing interests or complex decisions that have impacts or risks to a business, operations, culture, etc.</p>
<p>Personally, I most often do not include the &#8220;Mixed Feelings&#8221; or what would be considered the neutral option, as I feel it&#8217;s important that everyone participating offers his/her true level of yes or no.</p>
<table style="height: 311px;" width="693">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="124">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Wholehearted Endorsement</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><strong>Agree with Minor Reservations</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><strong>Agree with Major Reservations </strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><strong>Mixed Feelings </strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><strong>Don’t Like but Won’t Block</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><strong>Formal Disagreement</strong></td>
<td width="124">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Block </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="124">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>“I love it.”</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em> </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em> </em></p>
</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><em>“I like it and can live with it.” </em></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124">&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>“I can live with it but want my reservations addressed.” </em></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><em> </em></p>
<p><em>“I can go either way.” </em></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><em> </em></p>
<p><em>“I want my disagreement noted, but I’ll support it.” </em></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="124"><em> </em></p>
<p><em>“I don’t want to stop anyone else, but I don’t want to implement it.” </em></td>
<td width="124">
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>“I veto this proposal.” </em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>How to use the Gradients of Agreement </strong></p>
<p><strong>Step 1.</strong> Draw the diagram above on a flip chart, using the column headings you select. Either write the definitions below the column titles or print out the diagram and distribute it to the participants so that you can all be on the same page about what each level of agreement or disagreement means.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2.</strong> Articulate the proposed approach or decision so that everyone is crystal clear in thinking about what they are deciding on.</p>
<p><strong>Step 3. </strong> Have individuals mark or place a sticker where they are in relation to a proposed decision. Do this silently and quickly.</p>
<p><strong>Step 4.</strong> Collectively, review the chart and see what level of support is currently present. Explore both support and lack of support indicated by the group. The discussion should center around the following questions depending on your results:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>What about the proposed approach helped you decide affirmatively? </em></li>
<li><em>What about the proposed approach impeded your support or a greater level of support? </em></li>
<li><em>What reservations do you have &#8211; minor or major &#8211; that we should discuss? </em></li>
<li><em>What needs to be present to garner a higher level of support from you?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>You may have noticed, that none of the questions ask <em>&#8220;Why did you vote that way?&#8221;</em> or start with &#8220;Why.&#8221; &#8220;Why&#8221; is a justifying question and requires an individual to defend their decision. Use inquiry over advocacy in your discussions to understand the underlying reasons for support or lack of support.</p>
<p><strong>Step 5.</strong> Redraft the proposal as appropriate based on the discussions and then take another poll of the level of support for the new proposed approach. You can use a different color marker or sticker to show the progression of change in the level of agreement. How many rounds of polling, discussion, and redrafting you need will depends on the quality of the proposed approach, the complexity of the decision, the dynamics of the group, and your agreement about how much support is needed to move forward.</p>
<p><strong>Interpreting the results of your polling and what to do next. </strong></p>
<p>The following provides guidance to help you interpret your results using the Gradients of Agreement:</p>
<p><strong>Enthusiastic Support looks like:</strong> About 80% or more of the individuals are endorsing or agreeing with minor reservations, only 20% or less have mixed feelings, and there are no individuals not liking or blocking. Move forward, you are good to go.</p>
<p><strong>Lukewarm Support looks like:</strong> About 50% of individuals are endorsing or agreeing with minor reservations and 50% or so have mixed feelings. You could move forward but it would be better to have some further discussion to understand the mixed feelings and see how the proposal or decision could be tweaked to garner greater support.</p>
<p><strong>Ambiguous Support looks like: </strong>About 40% of individuals are endorsing or agreeing with reservations, 50% or more have mixed feelings, and 10% don’t like the proposal or have a formal disagreement but won’t block. Do not move forward. There needs to be more discussion to understand the mixed feelings and lack of support, refine the proposal or decision, and re-poll the group.</p>
<p><strong>Meager Support looks like: </strong>About 40% are endorsing or agreeing with reservations, about 40% have mixed feelings, and 20% or more don’t like the proposal, have a formal disagreement, or are blocking it. Do not move forward. There needs to be more discussion to understand the mixed feelings and lack of support, refine the proposal or decision, and re-poll the group.</p>
<p>Increasing the transparency of your critical thinking creates greater shared understanding, better decision-making and greater commitment for the outcomes.</p>
<p>If you found this article helpful, please share with your colleagues and friends.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/is-it-really-yes-or-no">Is it really &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no?&#8221; &#8211; How Much Agreement Do You Really Have?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://sharonweinberg.com/is-it-really-yes-or-no/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking Out Loud Together</title>
		<link>https://sharonweinberg.com/thinking-out-loud-together</link>
					<comments>https://sharonweinberg.com/thinking-out-loud-together#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Weinberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem-Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic and Critical Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team/Group Discussions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sharonweinberg.com/?p=1251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/thinking-out-loud-together">Thinking Out Loud Together</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_1 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
					<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_1">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_1  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_1  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner">&nbsp;

How many discussions did you have this week that you felt were a poor use of your time? 2? 4? 6? 10?&nbsp;Ouch!

Many discussions don’t leverage the minds in the room well because of the way statements and questions are framed. Rather than enhancing the discussion, what occurs is disengagement, or worse, a battle of words.

There are two simple ways to increase the engagement and critical thinking of your discussions: set the context and expectation in the beginning and balance the amount of advocacy and inquiry throughout the discussion. As simple as these approaches are, they often are not done.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

<strong>Set the context and expectation from the beginning.&nbsp;</strong>

Start any discussion with something along the lines of&nbsp;<em>“Here’s the problem or issue we need to discuss and address, and I need your help to achieve X. I’d like all of us to make an effort to take on a mindset of curiosity, learning, and consideration as we explore and create together.”&nbsp;</em>

Consider this opening sentence as your <em>“Hello”</em> to the discussion and a way to bring participants’ attention together. I know it seems ridiculously simple or hokey, but I (and likely you) have been part of too many discussions where this very small and important “stage setting” does not take place.

<strong>Balance advocacy and inquiry.&nbsp;</strong>

One of the greatest shortcomings I’ve seen and experienced is an imbalance between&nbsp;advocacy and inquiry. Advocacy is making the case for your own or another’s perspective; inquiry is about uncovering and learning about another’s perspective or suggestion.

It is in the framing of the statements and questions that either heightens the discussion and problem solving or shuts it down. Additionally, too much advocacy feels like a sales pitch and power play, diminishing listening, learning, and co-creation.

<em>The right balance is 25% advocacy and 75% inquiry&nbsp;– not the other way around.</em>

The Fifth Discipline Field Book&nbsp;offers sage guidance about how to advocate better and be a better inquirer. By framing your advocating and inquiring&nbsp;differently, you invite others to consider, reflect, contribute, and build more effectively. Below are some suggestions for improving advocacy and inquiry in your discussions. See what resonates with you.

<strong>Advocacy – Make your thinking process visible.&nbsp;</strong>
<ul>
 	<li>Share your assumptions and describe the data that lead to them.&nbsp;<em>“Here’s what I think and here’s how I got there.”&nbsp;</em></li>
 	<li>Explain your assumptions.&nbsp;<em>“I assumed that…”</em></li>
 	<li>Make your reasoning explicit.&nbsp;<em>“I drew this conclusion because…”</em></li>
 	<li>Give examples of what you propose, even if hypothetical or metaphorical.&nbsp;<em>“Here’s an example. Imagine that you are a member who will be affected…”</em></li>
 	<li>Reveal where you are least clear in your thinking.&nbsp;<em>“Here’s one aspect which you might help me think through.”</em></li>
 	<li>Listen, stay open, explore, and encourage others to provide different views (even when advocating).&nbsp;<em>“Do you see it differently and if so, in what way?”</em></li>
</ul>
<strong>Inquiry – Asking others to make their thinking process visible.&nbsp;</strong>
<ul>
 	<li>Gently&nbsp;find out the data from which they are operating.<em>“What (data/info) leads you to that conclusion?” “What causes you to say that?”&nbsp;</em></li>
 	<li>Ask in ways that don’t promote defensiveness.<em>“Can you help me understand your thinking here?”&nbsp;instead&nbsp;of&nbsp;“What do you mean?”&nbsp;</em></li>
 	<li>Draw out their reasoning.&nbsp;<em>“What’s the impact of the solutions for you? How does this relate to your concerns?” “Where does your reasoning go next?”</em></li>
 	<li>Explain your reasons for inquiring and how your inquiry relates to your own concerns, hopes, and needs.&nbsp;<em>“I’m asking about your assumptions because…”</em></li>
 	<li>Assess what they say by asking for broader contexts or examples.<em>“How would your proposal affect…?” “Is this similar to…?” Can you describe an example…?”</em></li>
 	<li>Check your understanding of what has been said.&nbsp;“Am I correct that you’re saying…?”</li>
</ul>
<strong>Reality Check: &nbsp;</strong>How many of these ways for advocating and inquiring productively do you practice regularly? How often do you see your teams, colleagues, superiors collaborate in this way? If the answer is not often, then it’s time to change the way you participate in and lead your discussions.
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Be the model for all those you work with to follow.</em></p>
<strong>Your Next Step:</strong>&nbsp;Choose one technique from the advocacy list and two techniques from the inquiry list to use in your next discussions. Use them over and over until they come more naturally for you. Then select a few more of the techniques. <em>Practice makes permanent.</em>

I encourage you to share the guidance with your participants, so you’ll collectively nurture and own the quality of your discussions.

Best wishes for engaging and productive discussions.

If you found this article helpful, please share it with your colleagues and network. Thanks.</div>
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->
				
				
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_row -->
				
				
			</div> <!-- .et_pb_section -->
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com/thinking-out-loud-together">Thinking Out Loud Together</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://sharonweinberg.com">Sharon Weinberg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://sharonweinberg.com/thinking-out-loud-together/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
